3 June -
Timothy Ketelaar
UCLA Communications Studies
Perception of Gains
& Losses
Emotions, Adaptive
Designs and Bird-Brained Utility Functions
Much
of the literature on emotion and judgment portrays emotions as a source
of irrational bias in decision-making. For example, the emotional
over-representation of losses relative to gains (the so-called "losses
loom larger than gains" effect) is commonly observed in human judgment
and is typically presented as evidence of irrational utility functions.
Yet, in the behavioral ecology literature, these very same results ("losses
loom larger than gains") are observed among foraging animals and these
findings are treated as examples of adaptive design. This paper presents
an adaptationist view of emotion in which emotional feeling states are viewed
as strategic mental states that represent the affordance structure of the
current environment. In a series of experiments, it is shown that
emotional reactions to gains and losses correspond to several key descriptive
properties of Utility functions, including the well-known "Losses loom larger
than gains" effect. These findings are discussed in terms of their
implications for understanding potential applications of emotion research
in Game Theory.